Skip to content

Strategy Lab

Explore the choices.
Find a promising path.

Let Strategy Lab test combinations of changes against the outcome you care about. Understand the moves behind a result before trying them in your plan.

Strategy LabInside MoneyWhatIf
Choose an outcome, explore candidate strategies, and inspect their trade-offs.Illustrative example
Strategy Lab
MoneyWhatIf Strategy Lab showing a three-move candidate path with contribution, cash investment, and withdrawal-order changes and their modeled impacts.

Fitted to the window width. Open original image ↗

See what’s possible

Which changes could make the biggest difference?

Define what matters and which choices are open for exploration, then compare the candidate paths the search finds.

Read the detailed guide

Choose your definition of better

Explore outcomes such as net worth, estate value, tax efficiency, and after-tax spending.

Stay in control of the search

Choose which saving, spending, property, investment, and tax decisions may change. Major lifestyle changes begin switched off.

Understand every move

Inspect the candidate’s changes and impact, then try the path in What-If before committing it to the plan.

Explore the details

Read a proposed change in everyday terms

An improved ending balance may involve a different budget along the way. The spending view helps translate a candidate strategy into the years and commitments it affects. Before applying a combination, examine what happens to housing, family costs, healthcare, and the expenses you intended to make flexible.

  • Compare the spending path with the outcome being optimized.
  • Keep the fixed commitments behind the budget in view.
Lifetime spendingInside MoneyWhatIf
The annual budget changes as one chapter gives way to the next.Illustrative example
Lifetime spending
Lifetime spending chart with housing, family, debt, and health costs shown as separate bands.

Fitted to the window width. Open original image ↗

From a question to a clearer picture

Set a goal, bound the search, and inspect a candidate

Strategy Lab reruns the plan across allowed changes, then compares moves and compatible combinations against your chosen outcome.

  1. Define the result and the allowed changes

    Choose net worth, after-tax money to spend, estate value, or tax efficiency. Review the allowed levers before running. Spending cuts, primary-home sales, relocation, and retirement timing require you to include them explicitly; their real-life assumptions still matter.

  2. Choose a depth and run the search

    Start with Standard or choose Thorough or Exhaustive to explore a broader set of candidates. Run the search and read its status. If you change the goal, plan, or boundaries, update the results so the comparison answers the question you are currently asking.

  3. Inspect the path before trying it

    Read the candidate's moves, modeled impacts, and What to check first details. Compare the other measures as well as the selected goal. Try a candidate in What-If to examine the resulting projection before choosing whether to keep the changes.

Connect the whole plan

Inspect the tax choices inside the combination

Saving, withdrawal, and tax choices can influence one another. When a candidate includes conversion decisions, dedicated tax planning provides another way to inspect the cost and the projected benefit. Use those details to understand why a move helps the combined plan and whether its assumptions fit your question.

  • Compare conversion costs with the full-plan result.
  • Review the proposed choices before applying a candidate.
Roth conversion analysisInside MoneyWhatIf
Compare conversion choices across the complete example forecast.Illustrative example
Roth conversion analysis
Comparison of Roth conversion targets with tax costs and ending financial outcomes.

Fitted to the window width. Open original image ↗

One way to use it · illustrative scenario

Explore saving and withdrawal choices together

Imagine a household with spare annual cash and several types of investment accounts. It wants to explore changes without moving home or altering retirement timing.

Try an example plan

The choice to explore

Keep those lifestyle levers off, allow relevant saving and withdrawal choices, and run a hypothetical net-worth search.

Where to look

If the search finds a candidate, read how each move changes the plan alone and within the combination. Check taxes, estate value, and any constraints alongside the selected goal.

What you could learn

Compatible moves can overlap or reinforce one another. The combined result must come from a full-plan comparison rather than adding the largest isolated gains.

Make sense of what you see

Read the reasoning behind a modeled path

The headline belongs to one objective

The candidate's prominent figure describes improvement in the chosen goal. Nearby net-worth, estate, and tax measures reveal other effects. Check whether amounts are changes from the baseline and whether today's money is selected before comparing them elsewhere.

Read the contribution of each move

Where available, the path shows a move on its own, its added effect given the other moves, and a running total. These readings explain why the combination can differ from the sum of individually priced actions.

Treat the action details as part of the result

Account ownership, contribution assumptions, withdrawal order, and What to check first details identify what the candidate actually changes. Review the ledger as well as the leading card to see which decisions were priced and which alternatives deserve attention.

A little more detail

Good questions to start with.

Is the leading candidate the best possible financial plan?

It is the best candidate found within the selected choices, assumptions, and search budget. Deeper searches examine more possibilities but do not establish a global optimum. Retirement timing is shown as a separate sensitivity rather than combined into a recommended path.

Can tax efficiency win just by leaving me with less?

The tax goal uses modeled safeguards against materially reducing after-tax wealth or making the plan run short sooner. The after-tax-spending goal considers funded spending plus ending after-tax wealth, so a candidate cannot win that goal simply by cutting spending.

Does running the search change my saved plan?

Running it produces candidate results. Trying a path opens a What-If comparison so you can inspect its effects before keeping it. Results based on earlier inputs must be updated before applying them to the current plan.

Know the language

Financial terms behind this feature

GeoarbitrageExpense RatioRobo-AdvisorAssets Under Management (AUM) FeeOpportunity CostTax-Efficient Withdrawal StrategyCatch-Up ContributionsQualified Charitable Distribution (QCD)
Browse all financial terms

Your next chapter

Bring your own what-if.

Start with your numbers. See where they could lead.

Build your forecast